Legal Opinion

Ingeneri v. Makris

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 17, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This case involves the collision of two automobiles at an intersection in Hartford. The plaintiff has appealed from the denial of her motion to set aside the verdict for the defendants and from the judgment, claiming that there was error in the charge and finding.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: Ashley Street, thirty-four feet wide, runs east and west and crosses Sigourney Street, thirty-six feet wide, at right angles. Sigourney Street is a through street and there are stop signs controlling traffic on Ashley Street. The intersection is substantially level and paved…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Neumann v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Weller v. Fish Transport Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Hall v. RootSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Rode v. Adley Express Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Gosselin v. PerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. Smith v. AspaasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Ramonas v. ZuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Corso v. SicignanoPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API