Pudil v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
In the ruling at issue in this appeal, the trial court held that the plaintiffs could not recover , both uninsured motorist and un-derinsured motorist benefits. We agree and so affirm.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
On December 22, 1995, the plaintiff, Steven Pudil, was a passenger in a truck being driven by Andrew Chalupsky when it was involved in a one-vehicle accident. Swisher Plumbing Company, Inc., Pudil and Chalupsky’s employer, owned the truck.
Chalupsky had no liability insurance at the time of the accident. The truck, however, was insured under a liability policy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American States Insurance Co. v. Estate of TollariSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Kluiter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- National Union Fire Insurance v. FerreiraHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
- Hornick v. Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Tri-State Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. GooyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Pella Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Lee v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Walnut Creek Townhome Association v. Depositors Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Clinton P. Jones, Individually And As Father And Next Friend Of Skye E. Jones, Minor Child Vs. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.