Legal Opinion

Thrash v. Deason

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 15, 1983No. 82-73, 82-74 and 82-75Published

1Opinion of the Court

435 So.2d 69 (1983)

Don L. THRASH

v.

Anita Y. Freeman DEASON.

Don L. THRASH

v.

W.A. FREEMAN, Jr.

Don L. THRASH

v.

W.A. FREEMAN.

82-73, 82-74 and 82-75.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 15, 1983.

C. Stephen Trimmier of Trimmier & Pate, Birmingham, for appellant.

James R. Bowles, Tallassee, for appellees.

JONES, Justice.

These cases involve basic contract law issues relating to a promisee's oral release of debt that arose from the sale of stock in an automobile dealership. Plaintiffs, as promisees, sued on promissory notes executed by Defendant. The trial court, finding insufficient evidence of consideration to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Willingham v. LankfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Carpenter v. Murphree & JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873
  4. Thrash v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Baumhauer v. McGillAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API