Legal Opinion
Federal Insurance v. County of Westchester
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 8, 1996No. 89 Civ. 2497 (JSR) (MDF)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
The primary legal issue raised by this application for a stay pending appeal is whether Rule 62(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure automatically accords a political subdivision of the State of New York the same right to a stay as the subdivision would have under New York Law. The Court concludes that it does not.
Background
On March 7, 1996, Magistrate Judge Fox, before whom this diversity action was tried on consent, issued a final judgment ordering defendant The County of Westchester (1) to pay damages to plaintiff Federal Insurance Company in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Castillo v. Montelepre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. PatakiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Holcim (US), Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010
- Continental Motors, Inc. v. Jewell Aircraft, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
- Harris v. ButlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Endress + Hauser, Inc. v. Hawk Measurement Systems Pty. Ltd.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.