Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Peden

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2008No. 2008-0007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, John Joseph Peden of Gahanna, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0021233, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1983. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice for six months, with the suspension stayed on remedial conditions, based on findings that respondent mishandled client funds in his possession and initially failed to cooperate in the disciplinary investigation. We adopt the findings of professional misconduct and the recommended sanction.

{¶ 2} Relator, Columbus Bar Association, charged…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DoellmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. VivyanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. DockryOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. NewcomerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Columbus Bar Association v. Keating.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API