Legal Opinion

de Brauwere v. de Brauwere

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by wife to recover of husband for necessaries of herself and infant children purchased with her own money.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitney, J.

Plaintiff, as she avers, is the wife of the defendant. On September 1, 19'04, when they were residing in the State of New York, he, without cause, abandoned her and her children, infants of the age of eighteen and under, and has since contributed nothing to their support except the sum of $50. She was unable to procure necessaries for herself and their children upon his credit, because he had none; and he removed to the State of New Jersey, where he has since resided in the city of Newark. During this period she has herself furnished the necessaries, partly by working as a seamstress and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierce v. . PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Pease v. . EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Stanton v. WillsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1808
  4. Dunlop v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Manchester v. . TibbettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Turner v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. George L. Schnader, Jr., Inc. v. Cole Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Corn Exchange Bank v. GrossAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  5. De Brauwere v. De BrauwereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API