Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Willson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided July 1, 1808PublishedCited by 31 opinions

MOTION for a new trial. These were actions of book debt for education and support, furnished by the plaintiff, before her intermarriage with Stanton, and by him afterwards, to the children of Bird. As both the cases depend upon the same principles, apd were argued together, it is not necessary ,. ,. . . , . lurther to distinguish them.

Read the full summary

MOTION for a new trial. These were actions of book debt for education and support, furnished by the plaintiff, before her intermarriage with Stanton, and by him afterwards, to the children of Bird. As both the cases depend upon the same principles, apd were argued together, it is not necessary ,. ,. . . , . lurther to distinguish them. The account produced at the trial consisted of the r , following articles: To cash paid Mr. Conklin for his wife’s nursing William, an infant son of said John Bird, from June 1st, 1797, to Jlfiril 1st, 1798, 43 weeks and three days, at 1 dollar, - - - - §43 43…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court. Smith and Baldwin», Judges,

dissenting. Swift, J. absent. Parents are hound by law to maintain, protect, and educate their legitimate children, during their infancy, or nonage. This duty rests on the father# *56audit is reasonable it should be so, as the personal estate of the wife, and in her possession at the time of the marriage, becomes the property of the husband, and . , & ,. instantly vests in him.

By the divorce, the relation of husband and wife was destroyed ; but not the relation between Bird and his children. His duty and liability, as to them, remained the same, except so…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. Zilley v. DunwiddieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Merriam v. Hartford & New-Haven Rail-roadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  3. Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey A. BALLEK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Finch v. FinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API