Legal Opinion

Sekor v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1923No. 17234Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Askren, J., entered December 30, 1921, upon findings in favor of defendant upon his counterclaim, in an action in replevin, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

Appellant, Cecil F. Sekor, brought this action in replevin to recover from respondent, Andrew Anderson, possession of an automobile, claiming that it was taken from him by force and intimidation. Respondent answered, setting up lawful possession, and counterclaimed for $381.95 for repair work done on the ear, supplies furnished, and.the like. From a judgment in favor of respondent foreclosing his lien against the car for the amount claimed, together with costs and attorney’s fees, this appeal is prosecuted.

It appears from the record that respondent had at an earlier date done some repair work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meeker v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Gilbert Co. v. HustedWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Standard Furniture House v. BurrowsWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Grote-Rankin Co. v. BrownellWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API