St. Louis County v. City of Manchester
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STORCKMANjJtáge.
This is a^ijijunctioKsiuiLwherein a Con-stitutionalSEJome Rule barter County seeks to enjoin a city-ofThe fourth class from constructing and operating a sewage treatment plant and related facilities outside of the city limits in a district designated as residential under the zoning laws and building regulations enacted by the county pursuant to its home rule charter. The defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ first amended petition was sustained and the petition dismissed. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial or, in the alternative, for a rehearing on the defendants’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Olivette v. GraelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Askew v. KoppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- City of Richmond v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Oliver Cadillac Co. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- City of Temple Terrace v. HILLSBOROUGH ASS'N, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- City of Kirkwood v. City of Sunset HillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Town of Oronoco v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Missouri Bankers Association, Inc., and Jonesburg State Bank v. St. Louis County, Missouri, and Charlie A. DooleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.