Legal Opinion

Giguere, Admr. v. Rosselot

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 3, 1939PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

This case has come here before final judgment. It is an action of tort against three defendants, two of whom, Robert Rosselot and Noel Noyes, are minors, and the third, Eugene Rosselot, Sr., is the father of said Robert, and is brought by the administrator of Sarah M. Giguere to recover damages suffered by the said Sarah in her lifetime as a result of a fatal shooting accident, and damages resulting from her death to her husband and next of kin. The fatal shot was fired from the dwelling house, or premises adjacent, of the defendant Eugene, located in the compact part of the village of St.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wellman v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  2. Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Woodcock's Admr. v. HallockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  5. Meers v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Montgomery v. DevoidSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. Russell v. PilgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  4. Barragan v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Town of Brighton v. Town of CharlestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API