Legal Opinion

Niblack v. Cosler

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided June 1, 1896No. 4,658PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was a suit in equity by William C. Niblack, receiver of the Columbia National Bank of Chicago, against S. S. Cosier, assignee of Dwiggins, Btarbuck & Co., a partnership doing business under the firm name of the Valley Bank, to compel the allowance of a certain claim.

1Opinion of the Court

BAG B, District Judge.

This suit is to compel the allowance of a claim against the Valley Bank, founded upon two certificates of deposit which the defendant ha.s rejected. The inai erial facts, as they appear in the record, are as follows:

Dwiggins, Starbuck & Co. owned a half interest in the Valley Bank, a private banking institution located at Yellow Springs, Ohio; and B. B. Bucket and his brother owned the other half. James M. Btarbuck of Dwig'gins, Btarbuck & Go., was president, W. ii. Btarbuck, vice president. B. B. Bucked, cashier, and B. B. Cosier, teller.

On the 17th of November, 1892,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Innerarity v. Merchants' National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Waynesville Nat. Bank v. IronsUnited States Circuit Court · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emerado Farmers Elevator Co. v. Farmers BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. National Bank of Oshkosh v. HungerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API