Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Kenney

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided December 29, 2000No. 4:99CV3318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

Before the court is Petitioner’s appeal (filing 54) from Magistrate Judge Piester’s Memorandum and Order entered on August 22, 2000 (filing 49), which, among other things:

1) found that Claims VII, VIII, IX, XIV, XV, and XVI are barred from consideration in this habeas action because of unexcused procedural default;

2) denied Petitioner’s request for an evi-dentiary hearing on Claim XVII;

3) denied Petitioner’s motion for discovery concerning Claim XVII (filing 22); and

4) denied Petitioner’s sealed motion (filing 21).

I construe Petitioner’s filing as a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Rogers v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ryan v. ClarkeDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API