First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Claassen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge:
¶ 1 This appeal follows a bench trial on a deficiency action following a judicial foreclosure. Appellant Theodore F. Claassen (Claassen) asserts that the trial court erred in determining that there was a nonpurchase, non-construction, money deficiency of $1,119,676.67 under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 33-729(A) (2014) which successor-lender First Financial Bank, N.A. (Bank) was entitled to pursue. 1 We agree as to $914,403.33 of the damages and, therefore, reverse in part and remand.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 The real property at issue is in a planned…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Schwarz v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stafford v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Aerial Funding v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Denitang v. Arizona TherapyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.