Legal Opinion

First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Claassen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 13, 2015No. 1 CA-CV 14-0123PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge:

¶ 1 This appeal follows a bench trial on a deficiency action following a judicial foreclosure. Appellant Theodore F. Claassen (Claassen) asserts that the trial court erred in determining that there was a nonpurchase, non-construction, money deficiency of $1,119,676.67 under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 33-729(A) (2014) which successor-lender First Financial Bank, N.A. (Bank) was entitled to pursue. 1 We agree as to $914,403.33 of the damages and, therefore, reverse in part and remand.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The real property at issue is in a planned…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Schwarz v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stafford v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Aerial Funding v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. Denitang v. Arizona TherapyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API