Smith v. NaphCare Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 MICHAEL T SMITH, et al. CASE NO. 3:22-cv-05069-DGE 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND 12 v. GRANTING IN DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS 13 NAPHCARE INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 I INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Kitsap County and NaphCare Inc.’s 18 motions to dismiss. (Dkt. Nos. 78, 80.) The Court considered the briefings filed in support of 19 and in opposition to the motions and the remainder of the record and hereby GRANTS in part 20 and DENIES in part…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.