Legal Opinion

Elting v. Dayton

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Cornelius W. H. Biting against Charles W. Dayton. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due upon a contract with the defendant for altering and repairing five buildings, and for certain extra work, not included in the contract. The complaint alleged that on the 25th of February, 1885, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant, by which the plaintiff agreed to alter and repair five buildings for the defendant, and furnish materials for the work, and the defendant promised and agreed with the plaintiff to pay him the sum therein mentioned therefor. The plaintiff also alleged by his complaint that he had…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Allen v. Dutchess County Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Schnaier v. NathanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Morowski v. RohrigNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  4. Beecher v. SchubackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Rowe v. GerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API