Legal Opinion

United States v. Cinergy Corp.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided May 29, 2009No. 1:99-cv-01693-LJM-JMSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

LARRY J. McKINNEY, District Judge.

On September 28, 2007, 2007 WL 2914540, this Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, the United States of America (the “Government”), and certain plaintiff-intervenors, the Hoosier Environmental Council and the Ohio Environmental Council, on their claims that defendants, Cinergy Corp., PSI Energy, Inc., and the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company (collectively, “Cinergy”), violated the terms of a 1998 Administrative Order and the provisions of an Ohio State Implementation Plan (“SIP”) that established limits on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Sierra Club v. Franklin County Power of Illinois, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ameren MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Cinergy Corp. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. United States v. Ameren Mo.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
  4. United States v. DTE Energy Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. DTE Energy Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API