Legal Opinion
Davis v. Krauss
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 4, 1982No. 79 C 1214PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, who is incarcerated and now has counsel appointed by the court, moves pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for leave to file an amended complaint. The Corporation Counsel of the City of New York (the City), appearing on behalf of the defendant police officers, objects in part.
The original complaint was filed pro se alleging a claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and asserting that the police officers used excessive force in arresting plaintiff on January 26, 1978 for armed robbery. The complaint named as defendants “Officer…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Village of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Ames v. VavreckDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hodge v. RupertoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Williams v. WardDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- Hood v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Pompey v. LumpkinDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- DuPree v. WaltersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.