Legal Opinion

Coddington v. Wells

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1883No. Case No. 1358PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Grimes. Tried below before Borman Gr. Kittrell, Esq., special judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.—

James E. Williams and wife, ancestors of appellants, sold four hundred and twelve acres of land and some negroes, in 1862, to Keach & Patrick for $20,000, of which $6,000 was paid in cash, and two notes, one for $4,000 and one for $10,000, falling due at different times, were executed for the remainder of the purchase money. The deed of conveyance retained a vendor’s lien on all the property sold to secure the payment of these notes *50and interest, and it was provided in it that upon full, payment of the notes and interest the deed was to become absolute. We are not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roeder v. RobsonTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Harris v. CatlinTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Harris v. CatlinTexas Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Moore v. GieseckeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. G. W. Tom & Wife v. WollhoeferTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Pierce v. MoremanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hill v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Gardener v. Griffith, ExecutorsTexas Supreme Court · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API