Legal Opinion

Massey v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 24, 1930No. 20107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The government resists the right to inspect. Carpenter v. Winn, 221 U. S. 533, 31 S. Ct. 683, 55 L. Ed. 842, and The Princess Sophia (D. C.) 269 F. 651. These cases are-grounded on section 724, Rev. St. (28 USCA § 636), which “in the trial of actions at law * * * on * * * notice * * * require the parties to produce books * * *' in their possession, * * * ” and the sec- ■ tion was regarded as a short and quick way of obtaining documentary evidence for use-in “the trial of an action at law. * * *

The right, if any, the plaintiff has is under the World War…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. In Re Connaway as Receiver of the Moscow National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. In re the Release or Relinquishment of the Right of Dower of MartinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
  5. Murray v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. United States v. ForeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  4. Puget Sound Nav. Co. v. Associated Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
  5. Tierney v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API