Legal Opinion
United States v. Soolook
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1993No. Nos. 92-30456, 92-30457, 92-30460, 92-30461, 92-30488, 92-30489, 92-30501, 92-30510PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
These appeals arise from the same district court proceeding in which the defendants consented to the Magistrate-Judge’s jurisdiction over their criminal trials pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3401. Judgment was imposed by the Magistrate-Judge for misdemeanor violations of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1371(b). Defendants filed their notices of appeal with the Clerk of the district court and proceeded to prosecute the appeals in this court.
An appeal of right from a criminal conviction imposed by a Magistrate-Judge “shall lie” to a judge of the district court and must first be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Harvey W. Van FossanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Midway Manufacturing Co., an Illinois Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Larry Kruckenberg, Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Debra L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Olivia JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Manning-RossCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. ManciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Hernandez-Ruiz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.