The Snipsic Co. v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from judgment rendered against defendant for failure to further plead after demurrer sustained to his answer.
The complaint states a cause of action for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff’s assignor to defendant, and is unverified.
The answer sets up two defenses. The first specifically denies every allegation of the complaint, including the allegation of nonpayment and of the assignment to plaintiff.
As a separate defense defendant set up as affirmative matter that he was fraudulently induced to sign the writing referred to in the complaint.
The demurrer to the answer was a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Nudd v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Botto v. VandamentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- McDonald v. S. Cal. Ry.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. RoggenkampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Calexico Lumber Co. v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Tustin Packing Co. v. Pacific Coast Fruit Auction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Newark Trust Co. v. KriebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Southern Glass Co. v. Beverly Dairies, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- California Mutual Co. v. VoigtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.