Legal Opinion

Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter H. Moulton, J.

In this asbestos personal injury action, plaintiff claims that his decedent contracted mesothelioma because of exposure to talc manufactured by defendant Colgate-Palmolive Company.

Colgate moves for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and any cross claims against it. Defendant asserts that the motion should be granted because (1) plaintiffs’ action is untimely under CPLR 214-c (2); (2) plaintiffs failed to exclude other potential causes of deceased plaintiff Arlene Feinberg’s mesothelioma; (3) plaintiffs failed to prove that Cashmere…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Snyder v. Town Insulation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Matter of Ny County Des Litig.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Ramos v. Howard Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Candelaria v. Conopco, Inc., d/b/a Unilever Home & Personal Care USADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
  2. Hossain v. Unilever United States, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
  3. Kristi Vuksanovich and Mark Vuksanovich v. Airbus Americas, Inc. and Airbus S.A.S.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  4. Sarkees v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
  5. Vuksanovich v. Airbus Group HQ, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API