Legal Opinion
Elizabeth Candelaria v. Conopco, Inc., d/b/a Unilever Home & Personal Care USA
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 30, 2026No. 1:21-cv-06760Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELIZABETH CANDELARIA, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER – against – 21-cv-06760 (NCM) (TAM) CONOPCO, INC., d/b/a UNILEVER HOME & PERSONAL CARE USA, Defendant. NATASHA C. MERLE, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Elizabeth Candelaria brings this action against defendant Conopco, Inc., doing business as Unilever Home & Personal Care USA, alleging that she suffered significant hair loss as a result of an allergic reaction to preservatives contained in certain TRESemmé Products, including TRESemmé Color Revitalize shampoo. See generally…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fabrikant v. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Davis-Garett v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Amnesty America v. Town of West HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- McKinney v. City of MiddletownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.