Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. Diciccio

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 11, 2015No. Nos. 1 CA-CV 13-0364, 1 CA-CV 14-0135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWE, Judge:

¶ 1 The City of Phoenix (“City”) and the intervenor police officers and the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association (collectively, “PLEA”) appeal the trial court’s order enjoining enforcement of “release time” provisions of the 2012-14 Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the City and PLEA Under this agreement, the City paid PLEA approximately $1.7 million in release time, which is time police officers are released from police duties for the City to allow them to perform PLEA activities and business. The City and PLEA argue that the trial court erred by finding the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. cheatham/huey v. Diciccio/phoenix Law Enforcement AssociationArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. cheatham/huey v. Diciccio/phoenix Law Enforcement AssociationArizona Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API