Legal Opinion

Courtney v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1915No. 5361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Craig County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by J. L. Courtney against A. H. Gibson and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. This action was brought prior to statehood in the United States Court for the Northern District of the Indian Territory, and resulted in that court in a judgment for plaintiff, which was reversed on appeal by the Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, in Barbies v. Courtney, 6 Ind.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Craig County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by J. L. Courtney against A. H. Gibson and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. This action was brought prior to statehood in the United States Court for the Northern District of the Indian Territory, and resulted in that court in a judgment for plaintiff, which was reversed on appeal by the Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, in Barbies v. Courtney, 6 Ind. T. 379, 98 S. W.. 133, and the case remanded for a new trial. Prior to the new trial, statehood intervened, and the case was -properly…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DEVEREUX, C.

(after stating the facts as above). We have carefully examined the record in this case, and the report of the same case when heard by the Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, and the evidence appears to be substantially the same. In fact, by stipulation of the parties, a large part of the evidence on this trial was read from the bill of exceptions on the former appeal. This being the condition of the record, the law of the case was settled by the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory.

In Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. Bridges, 37 Okla.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. v. BaumhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. MaschoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Progress Brewing Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Oklahoma Land Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Harness v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Lane v. Floorcraft Clyde Beherens, LtdCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API