Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Dynan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2004No. 12161-3PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

98 P.3d 444 (2004)

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST Mark J. DYNAN, Attorney at Law.

No. 12161-3.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 9, 2004.

Decided September 30, 2004.

As Amended on Denial of Reconsideration November 30, 2004.

Douglas M. Fryer, Anthony Lawrence Butler, Washington State Bar, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Edward Sydney Winskill, Davies Pearson PC, Tacoma, for Respondent.

OWENS, J.

Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) retained Mark J. Dynan in three different lawsuits to represent people insured by the company. Dynan requested attorney fees in these suits…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API