Legal Opinion

Haskett v. Alexander

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1893No. 16,286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

The will of Mary Ann Erisman was probated in Vigo county on the 4th day of August, 1887. It contains, among others, the following provisions:

“2. I give, bequeath and devise to my beloved daughter, Harriet E. Haskett, the following real and personal property, to wit: The north half of the southwest quarter of section number twelve, in township number eleven north, of range number nine, situate in the county of Vigo, State of Indiana, except twenty acres heretofore transferred to Samuel Cosby: Provided, That when the said Harriet E. Haskett sells or disposes of said realty, she may pay to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brumfield v. DrookIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Kelly v. StinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Critchell v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Pugh v. PughIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Conover v. CadeIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Estate of Lannon, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API