Legal Opinion

Estate of Lannon

Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

Decided August 24, 1897No. 17,778Published

The opinion in Estate of Lannon was among those destroyed in San Francisco by the conflagration of 1906.

1Opinion of the Court

PEESONAL LIABILITY OF DEVISEES FOB CHABGES IMPOSED BY THE WILL.

For Payment of Legacies.—It is a well-recognized rule that when real estate is devised with directions to the devisee to pay a legacy, an acceptance of the devise carries with it the personal obligation on the part of the devisee to pay the legacy as directed. This personal liability may be created by the testator directly, without charging the property: Mason v. Smith, 49 Ala. 71; Olmstead v. Brush, 27 Conn. 530; Mahar v. O’Hara, 9 Ill. 424; Spearman v. Foote, 126 Ill. App. 370; Appeal of Haworth, 105 Pa. 362; Anderson v.…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Fish v. HowlandNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  2. Brown v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Collister v. . FassittNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Funk v. EgglestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Hoyt v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API