Legal Opinion
Khreativity Unlimited v. Mattel, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 2000No. 99 CIV. 9321 SASPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Defendant Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) moves for summary judgment on both claims filed against it by plaintiff Khreativity Unlimited, Inc. (“Khreativity”). In January 1998, Mattel entered into a licensing agreement with the National Basketball Association (“NBA”) to produce a variety of NBA-related toys. Khreativity claims that the idea for this licensing agreement came from a series of meetings and phone calls between Khreativity, Mattel and the NBA in April and May 1998. In its Complaint, Khreativity alleges that Mattel breached an express or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schwapp v. Town of AvonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Stella Chertkova v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Lawrence A. Mitchell, Jr. v. Washingtonville Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Victor G. Reiling Associates v. Fisher-Price, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Hettinger v. KleinmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Johnson v. Benjamin Moore & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Sokol Holdings, Inc. v. BMB Munai, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Vent v. MARS SNACKFOOD US, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.