Legal Opinion

Bell v. City of Torrance

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1990No. B042204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant Alberta L. Bell (Bell) appeals a judgment denying her petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) wherein she sought reinstatement as a permanent employee of defendant and respondent City of Torrance (the City).

The essential issue presented is whether Bell was a probationary employee at the time the City terminated her employment, so as to entitle the City to terminate her without according her any administrative review.

Because we conclude Bell was terminated within the probationary period as extended by her extensive absence, and received…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Wiles v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Brown v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hernandez v. Rancho Santiago Cmty. Coll. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Carrasco v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Hernandez v. Rancho Santiago Community College Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. People v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API