Legal Opinion
Michigan Cent. R. v. Harsha
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1904No. 1,313PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.
1Opinion of the Court
BURTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the court below requiring the appellant to pay to W. D. Harsha, as clerk of the Circuit Court, $2,660 for receiving, keeping, and paying out $266,-000, within the meaning and intent of section 828, Rev. St. [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 635], This order was made upon á petition filed by the clerk praying that the Michigan Central Railroad Company be required to show cause why it should not be required to pay certain costs claimed by him, consisting of three items, to wit:
“One per cent on $266,000.00....................................…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re Michigan Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Ex parte PlittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1853
- In re GoodrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1878
- Thomas v. Chicago & C. S. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1889
- Easton v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Texas · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- S. Morgan Smith Co. v. Rockingham Power Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1909
- Ford Motor Co. v. VoorheisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- In re Village of Newark Urban Renewal AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 1973