Legal Opinion

Easton v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Texas

Decided January 13, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

In the final decree, directing the sale of the mortgaged property in this cause, among other provisions, was the following:

“That of the purchase price bid on such sale a deposit, amounting to the sum of one hundred thousand dollars, ($100,000.00,) shall be paid in cash to the commissioner at the time of sale, and shall be deposited in the registry of this court to the order of the cause. If separate bids be made and accepted for separate portions of the property to be sold, then the deposit so made shall not be less than seventy-five thousand dollars on the purchase of the main line of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte PlittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1853
  2. Ex parte PrescottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Michigan Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  2. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. DartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
  3. Johnson v. Southern Building & Loan Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1899
  4. Michigan Cent. R. v. HarshaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  5. Northwestern Mut. Life Insurance v. QuinnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API