Hessig-Ellis Drug Co. v. Stone
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court, Shelby County.— FeaNCIs Fentress, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lausden
The only question necessary to be determined in this case is whether the appellants Sager and Brookover have acquired a lien asserted in their petition. The chancellor held that they had not perfected the lien claimed because no attachment was issued and levied upon the stock of drugs, and because the act of 1905 creating the lien is unconstitutional and void.
The petitioners were employees of Mrs. Stone, one the prescription clerk and the other a porter in her drug store. She is indebted to them for wages in the sum stated in the petition.
The original bill is a general creditor’s bill against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- S. B. Luttrell & Co. v. Knoxville, La Follette & Jellico RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Dyer v. HutchinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
- Bryan v. ZarecorTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Burnett v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cheatham County v. MurffTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
- Willis v. Mann Const. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Nicely v. NicelyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928