Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Turner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

FROM HAMBLEN. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamblen County. JohN P.'Smith, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.

H. B. Liverman contracted to build and partly bnilt house for G-. K. Turner upon a lot, the. title of which was in the wife of <3-. K. Turner for life, remainder to their son, David Payne Turner, a minor.

Burnet, the complainant, sold to Liverman lumber of which the house was built, and brings this suit to enforce a supposed furnisher’s lien thereon under the Act of 1887, entitled “An act to provide a more just and equitable mechanic’s lien law, and to afford mechanics, contractors, sub-contractors, and material men greater security for work done and material furnished.” Acts 1887, page 165.

In…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Goodbar v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. RunnelsTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Willis v. Mann Const. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API