Legal Opinion

United States v. Yaul

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 4, 1978No. ACM 22369PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ARROWOOD, Judge:

Trial defense counsel asserts in the assignment of errors accompanying the accused’s request for appellate representation that the military judge committed prejudicial error when, prior to assembly of the court, he excused a court member over defense objection. We find that the objection, made after the court was assembled, was untimely and that the military judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling it.

When the trial counsel completed accounting for the members appointed to the court, the military judge made the following statement:

For the purpose of the record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HansenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. BanksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. CagleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. CheathamU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API