Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided March 4, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge McCandless
Reversing.
George M. Johnson and. O. M. Dixon were the joint owners of a tract of land, their interests being four-fifths and one-fifth respectively.
*329On the 9th day of March, 1917, the parties named, executed a written agreement whereby each was to select a commissioner, who, together with W. R. Richmond, county surveyor of Johnson county, after being duly sworn were to go upon the lands on the 3rd day of April, 1917, and divide same in proportion of four-fifths to one-fifth 'according to quantity, quality and value; and further agreeing, “After the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reager's Administratrix v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Stone v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Adams' adm'r v. RingoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
- Rudd v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
- Hensley v. Wasiota & Black Mountain RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Rosa v. NavaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- McCormack v. ClouseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Hensler v. AlberdingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1931