Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided January 20, 1931PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirming.
In its final analysis the important issue involved in this case is the right of an indemnity company to revoke the waiver of a forfeiture of the, indemnity because of a failure of the insured to conform to a condition contained in the contract. An abridged statement of the facts will disclose how the question arose.
Dr. E.H. Miller, of Vine Grove, Ky., owned an automobile which was maintained for the use of his family. The United States Fidelity Guaranty Company issued to him a liability insurance contract with omnibus coverage "to any person legally operating the automobile." The…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Insurance Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- American Locomotive Co. v. Gyro Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Engstrom v. FARMERS & BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Sentinel Fire Insurance v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Copco Steel & Engineering Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Bates v. Grain Dealers National Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.