Legal Opinion

Brantley v. Dunstan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1972No. 721SC658PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

The only question presented is whether the complaint is sufficient to withstand defendants’ motions to dismiss, made pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b) (6). We hold that it is and reverse the judgment dismissing the action.

Allegations in the complaint, when construed liberally, are sufficient to show the following: Defendants, practicing attorneys, were retained by plaintiff to represent him in connection with a claim for personal injuries and property damage arising from an automobile accident with Lester Sawyer on 26 November 1962. Defendants falsely represented to plaintiff on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Cassels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Lewis v. Gastonia Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API