Legal Opinion

Mason Ex Rel. Cannon v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2003No. S-01-1265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

Nebraska’s Welfare Reform Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 68-1708 et seq. (Reissue 1996 & Cum. Supp. 2002), generally requires that while receiving cash assistance benefits, recipient families in which at least one adult has the capacity to work must participate in a “self-sufficiency contract,” which sets forth certain approved work-related activities in which recipients must engage. See Kosmicki v. State, 264 Neb. 887, 652 N.W.2d 883 (2002). When no adult in the family has the capacity to work, however, no self-sufficiency contract is required. See 468 Neb. Admin. Code, ch. 2, § 020.01(3)(b)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Hass v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re DeWayne G., Jr.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Pfizer Inc. v. Lancaster County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Soto v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kuhn v. WELLS FARGO BANK OF NEBRASKANebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Huy Le v. LautrupNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Huy Le v. LautrupNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API