Legal Opinion

In the Interest of B.O.G.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 2001No. 10-00-198-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANCE, Justice.

This is a case about a Texas court’s jurisdiction over the conservatorship and possession of, access to, and child support for a child who has moved to another state. The trial court, responding to a request by the managing conservator who had moved to Virginia with the child, dismissed all pending motions for lack of jurisdiction, including motions to modify conservator-ship and child support filed by the posses-sory conservator, and a motion to modify visitation filed by the grandparents who had court-ordered grandparental visitation rights. We will affirm the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. BeaberTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ex Parte GoadTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wilson v. Kutler, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.C.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Ferguson v. Wallace-FergusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Neal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Castro v. HaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Ronnie Joe Neal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API