Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Wallace-Ferguson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2018No. 20170213PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Alexander Ferguson appeals from a fourth amended judgment increasing his child support obligation. We conclude the district court retained jurisdiction to modify his child support obligation under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ("UIFSA"), as enacted in N.D.C.C. ch. 14-12.2. We further conclude the court did not err in determining his child support obligation. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] At times relevant to these proceeding, Alexander Ferguson and Samantha Wallace-Ferguson, now known as Samantha Oliver, were active members in the United States military. The parties…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nelson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Estate of ElkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. LeTellier v. LeTellierTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Zajac v. Traill County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Harshberger v. HarshbergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gooss v. GoossNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Knudson v. KnudsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Bindas v. BindasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Markegard v. WilloughbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API