United States v. American Express Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7634 (T. D. 34907).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The merchandise in question in this case is colored catgut strings in lengths suitable to be used in stringing tennis rackets. It was assessed for duty as manufactures of catgut under paragraph 462 of the tariff act of 1909. On appeal to the Board of General Appraisers it was held to be free of duty under paragraph 509, which reads:
Catgut, whip gut, or worm gut, unmanufactured.
The appraiser in classifying this article for duty evidently ro-ceeded upon the theory that colored catgut should be classified as a manufacture of catgut, although in other respects precisely similar to catgut strings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Richard v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Fischer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bernard v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924