Legal Opinion
J.E. Hanger, Inc. v. Scussel
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided July 30, 1996No. Civil Action 96-C-901-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARROLL, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This cause is before the court on the Application for Preliminary Injunctive Relief filed by the plaintiff, J.E. Hanger (Hanger), on May 30, 1996. 1 Hanger alleges that the defendant, Richard Scussel (Seussel), a former employee of Hanger, engaged in activities “competitive with Hanger” and solicited Hanger customers and employees, contrary to the terms of his Employment Agreement. In addition, Hanger claims that Scussel “used, modified or adapted” trade secrets and confidential information in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kenneth R. Cate, Esquire, and Maher, Overchuck, Langa & Cate, a Florida Association v. Gordon G. Oldham, Jr., and State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Ferrero v. Associated Materials Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- KPMG Peat Marwick LLP v. FernandezCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Benchmark Medical Holdings, Inc. v. BarnesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- Hightower Holding, LLC v. John GibsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023