Legal Opinion

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP v. Fernandez

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 6, 1998No. Civil Action No. 15570PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAMB, Vice Chancellor.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP (“KPMG”) has moved for an order enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement it entered into on or about August 7, 1997 (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the defendants in this action and several others (“Respondents”) all of whom are former KPMG partners. KPMG seeks leave to conduct discovery to determine the scope of the Respondents’ alleged breach of that agreement. Plaintiff, petitioner, also seeks an order extending for an additional six months the time period provided in the Settlement Agreement during which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. American Welding & Engineering Co. v. LuebkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. J.E. Hanger, Inc. v. ScusselDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edelman Financial Engines, LLC v. ButeraDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  2. FP UC Holdings, LLC, FPMCM, LLC, and Fast Pace Medical Clinic, PLLC v. James W. Hamilton, Jr. and Lynn Ashley HamiltonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
  3. NuVasive, Inc. v. DayDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  4. NuVasive, Inc. v. RichardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  5. United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. CorzineDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API