Legal Opinion
United States v. Haim
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1963PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
The Government has filed an eighty-five count indictment which alleges that Charles Haim, Sidney Haim, Gladys Scheer, and a corporate defendant, Goddard’s Ltd., together with other defendants conspired to violate several federal criminal statutes by importing Dutch whiskey into the United States under the guise that the Dutch whiskey was “Scotch” whiskey.
These named defendants have now moved to dismiss the indictment, urging five separate grounds of attack. 1 Some of the grounds for objection involve the relationship and alleged duplication of the criminal charges…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- United States v. SpockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Clarence E. BraaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.