Legal Opinion
Conard v. Bowen
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided December 14, 1988No. Civ. No. 87-71-WPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DONALD E. O'BRIEN, Chief Judge.
The matters now before the court are plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion to affirm the Secretary’s decision. After careful consideration, it is the decision of this court to grant defendant’s motion to affirm the Secretary’s decision. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is hereby denied.
I. Facts.
Plaintiff is a 33-year-old male with a high-school education. Plaintiff’s past relevant work activity was as a machine operator, truck repairman, x-ray developing machine operator, farm hand, carpenter, and laborer. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gavin v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Nadine BENSKIN, Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Richard A. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary, Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.