Williams v. Viselich
California Supreme Court
' APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order refusing a new trial. Ansel Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action upon a street assessment.
Upon the completion of the work an assessment therefor was made by the street commissioner, from which the contractor appealed to the city council. The city council, after hearing the appeal, set aside the assessment and directed that another be made, and upon this latter assessment the present action was brought and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant.
The ground presented in support of the appeal therefrom is that the notice of the appeal to the city council from the first assessment was insufficient, and. that the city council acquired no jurisdiction…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alley v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Palmer v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Realty Trust Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933