People v. Bustam
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
The defendant, Ernest Bustam, has been charged with possession of narcotic drugs for sale 1 and possession of dangerous drugs with the intent to dispense.2 The People bring this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 to challenge the district court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence and his motion for return of all nondrug related property. We reverse the ruling of the trial court.
The facts are not in dispute. Denver police, working with the assistance of an agent from the Drug Enforcement Administration of the United States Department of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. UnruhSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Mendez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. JansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. TurnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.