Legal Opinion

Cagle v. Butcher

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1978No. 13164PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

Appellant Mary E. Cagle appealed from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of David E. Butcher, appellee, which set aside the execution sale of a chose in action. We took jurisdiction pursuant to Sup.Ct.R. 47(e)(5).

The appellant, Mary E. Cagle, became a judgment creditor of her former husband, Ray E. Cagle. A writ of execution was issued and levy was made by the sheriff on a certain chose in action. A sheriff’s sale of the chose in action was held in January, 1975. Donald W. Poppe, the obligor under the chose in action in question, instituted an interpleader action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. FavourArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Jackson v. Northland Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Haigler v. BursonArizona Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Smith v. Jackson Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Galloway v. VanderpoolArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Winder v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API