Legal Opinion
ROSNER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 12, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00225Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE KATHY R., ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 1:24-cv-00225-KFW ) FRANK BISIGNANO, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant ) MEMORANDUM DECISION1 The Plaintiff in this Supplemental Security Income appeal contends that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erroneously interpreted the medical opinion evidence as well as her testimony. See Plaintiff’s Brief (ECF No. 14). For the reasons that follow, I affirm the Commissioner’s decision. I. Background The Plaintiff applied for benefits in April 2021. See Record at 19. After her claim was denied at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Vining v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Carmen De Jesus v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992